A veteran Harris County deputy constable resigned under investigation but quickly got another job with another department.

Sgt. Wayne Schultz worked for Precinct 1 Constable Alan Rosen until July 7, according to state records.

The constable’s office says, as the result of a proactive investigation, he was caught with a GPS scrambling device on his county patrol car, which is an FCC violation. After almost three years with the department, Schultz resigned.

“We do not tolerate this behavior,” Precinct 1 said in a statement. “He was taken off patrol and soon thereafter given a ‘general discharge,’ not an honorable discharge.

Agencies have to choose between three categories when reporting an officer’s separation to the Texas Commission on Law Enforcement (TCOLE). They are general, honorable, and dishonorable.

With Schultz’s general discharge, 10 days later, he had a job at the Harris County Precinct 6 Constable’s Office.

“We follow the law, and we follow the rules of TCOLE,” a spokesman with Precinct 6 Constable Silvia Trevino’s Office said.

Texas 2036 is a nonprofit that has studied officers who change departments under suspicious circumstances. They are called “wandering officers.”

“Research from Florida shows wandering officers who get fired or are let go for misconduct or poor performance. They’re more likely than their peers to engage in further misconduct and further bad behavior,” Luis Soberon, a policy advisor for Texas 2036, said. “It’s a question of quality and the caliber of law officers who are serving Texans every day.”

The organization has made recommendations, and in this legislative session, lawmakers took action. A law was passed to create a new system for reporting officer misconduct. Agencies will be required to send detailed accounts to the state when officers resign or are fired.

“Making sure there are more checks in place. Those are the kinds of things that can make progress in stopping wandering officers from moving between agencies,” Soberon added.

Schultz, who has worked for six departments over 30 years, according to TCOLE, did not respond to a request for comment. He has not been charged with a crime.

Precinct 1 sent a complete statement which reads in part:

“We proactively investigated this case after we discovered the GPS scrambling device in his patrol car. The device is an FCC violation and, therefore, against our policy to have one. After a lengthy investigation we found NO evidence he was using it in his vehicle so that he could work an extra job while on duty. He claimed he had the device so that a family member couldn’t track him. But again, it is an FCC violation. We do not tolerate this behavior. He was taken off patrol and soon thereafter given a “general discharge.” Not an “honorable discharge.” Pct 6 has access to his entire Pct .1 file, including the investigation.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *